Google Allegedly Adjusts Ad Auctions To Meet Revenue Goals – Search Engine Journal

Walk away with new knowledge from 9-figure ecommerce brands that you can apply immediately.
Learn how to make every location AI-ready in the next 90 days.
Get your fresh, 2026 small business marketing plan, from SEO to PPC to AI Search.
This data‑driven guide contains essential information and actionable steps for SEOs navigating the shift toward AI as the first surface of search.
Learn how to build off-page authority & prove to Google that you deserve a high-visibility spot on AI SERPs.
Walk away with new knowledge from 9-figure ecommerce brands that you can apply immediately.
Google has quietly made changes to its advertising auctions to boost revenues, according to testimony by a company executive.
In an ongoing federal antitrust trial, Google’s advertising practices are spotlighted this week.
Jerry Dischler, Vice President for Google’s advertising products, testified that Google adjusts its advertising auctions to meet revenue targets.
These adjustments, including price increases of up to 5%, are carried out without informing the advertisers.
This testimony is part of a larger case in which the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) alleges that Google has unlawfully maintained an online search monopoly.
As the trial continues, Google’s pricing changes, its competition with Amazon, and the impact of its policies on advertisers are all coming into focus.
Dischler revealed during a federal antitrust trial on Monday that the tech giant regularly changes its ad auctions. These modifications, aimed at selling search ads, are carried out without notifying the advertisers.
“We tend not to tell advertisers about pricing changes,” Dischler stated.
He disclosed that in May 2019, his team was working on finding ways to ensure Google met the quarterly revenue targets set by Google’s CFO, Ruth Porat. He warned that failing to meet these expectations would result in a negative market response.
Dischler expressed concern about revenue and that a significant drop in Google’s stock price could negatively impact employee morale, especially for teams living in high-cost areas.
Dischler further clarified his intent during the trial, stating his goal was “to get creative so we could meet our quota.”
Dischler says over 60% of Google’s total revenue comes from search ads, amounting to over $100 billion in 2020.
However, he emphasized that Google maintains an “honest results” policy, and the search team responsible for unpaid search results can disregard suggestions from the ads team.
He explained, “Financial compensation shouldn’t impact the quality of the search results. Revenue is motivator, not a decider.”
Dischler admitted that some auction changes resulted in a 5% increase in costs for the average advertiser, with some even seeing price hikes of up to 10%.
Despite this, he believes that a price increase of 15% would lead most advertisers to switch to competitors such as Meta Platforms Inc. or ByteDance Ltd.’s TikTok.
“It would be a dangerous thing to do,” he cautioned.
Still, Dischler acknowledged that he had no reason to believe that Google wouldn’t retain enough advertisers to keep its revenue rising, even if prices were raised by 15%.
Google is currently facing stiff competition from Amazon in the retail advertising sector.
Dischler admitted that consumer goods manufacturers have threatened to shift their ad spending from Google to Amazon, which is growing at twice the rate in retail advertising.
“Amazon is able to get better data than we are on the effectiveness of their advertising. That has caused budgets to shift,” Dischler said.
One specific change that boosted Google’s revenue, RGSP, altered the ad auction process so that the second-highest bidder would win the top advertising slot, with the actual winner taking the second spot.
Dischler revealed that while he didn’t know if this change led advertisers to place higher bids, it did increase Google’s revenue.
A Google spokesperson at the trial declined to comment on Dischler’s testimony.
The U.S. DOJ alleges that Google has unlawfully maintained an online search monopoly by paying billions to web browsers and smartphone manufacturers to ensure Google is the default search engine for users.
As the antitrust trial continues, Google’s advertising practices remain under scrutiny.
With rising competition from Amazon in retail advertising and threats of advertisers switching platforms, Google faces challenges in balancing revenue motivations with fair business practices.
The outcome of the trial and advertiser responses to Dischler’s revelations will determine if adjustments are on the horizon for Google’s ad auctions and pricing strategies.
Featured Image: CHRISTOPHER E ZIMMER/Shutterstock
Matt G. Southern, Senior News Writer, has been with Search Engine Journal since 2013. With a bachelor’s degree in communications, …
Join 75,000+ Digital Leaders.
Learn how to connect search, AI, and PPC into one unstoppable strategy.
Join 75,000+ Digital Leaders.
Learn how to connect search, AI, and PPC into one unstoppable strategy.
Join 75,000+ Digital Leaders.
Learn how to connect search, AI, and PPC into one unstoppable strategy.
In a world ruled by algorithms, SEJ brings timely, relevant information for SEOs, marketers, and entrepreneurs to optimize and grow their businesses — and careers.
Copyright © 2026 Search Engine Journal. All rights reserved. Published by Alpha Brand Media.

source