Agree & Join LinkedIn
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedInโs User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
124,126 followers
๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐จ๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ก๐๐ง๐ ๐ โ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐ฅ๐จ๐ญโ ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐-๐๐๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ง. Californiaโs DMV says Tesla could face a temporary 30-day suspension of its dealer license after an administrative judge found Teslaโs marketing around โAutopilotโ and โFull Self-Driving capabilityโ could mislead consumers about what its driver-assistance features can actually do. The DMV has stayed the suspension for now and is giving Tesla 60 days to modify or remove the problematic language to avoid the penalty. This suspension is less about one term and more about regulatory control of โtrust languageโ in semi-autonomous driving. If California (Teslaโs most important US market) sets a workable compliance template, other regulators and plaintiff lawyers can reuse it, raising the cost of aggressive autonomy branding across the industry while rewarding firms that market ADAS as โassistance,โ not autonomy.ย
https://nilionanini.wordpress.com/2025/10/30/move-or-die-how-god-called-a-banker-out-of-corporate-to-build-two-thriving-businesses/
To view or add a comment, sign in
๐๐ถ๐ฑ ๐ง๐ฒ๐๐น๐ฎ ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐น๐ณ-๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐๐ฝ๐ฒ? The DMV has adopted a judge’s ruling that Tesla’s โAutopilotโ and โFull Self-Drivingโ marketing is misleading โ thatโs a big regulatory red flag for the industry. The Verge and the DMV news release report the agency warned Tesla it could face a 30-day suspension of its sales license in California unless marketing is corrected within 60 days. The article also frames real-world concerns described by reporters about how those names influence driver expectations. I think this ruling exposes a core tension: product naming and marketing can change user behavior faster than safety validations do. If you build systems people trust implicitly because of a brand, regulators will push back when outcomes donโt match claims. My take: clearer terminology and honest disclosure should be non-negotiable for AV suppliers and OEMs. What controls should be mandatory for autonomous feature naming and claims? How would you balance innovation with consumer protection? Read more: https://lnkd.in/em_ErRxv #AIEthics, #AutonomousVehicles, #Regulation, #Mobility, #Tesla, #Autopilot
To view or add a comment, sign in
184 followers
Californiaโs DMV has adopted a judgeโs ruling that Tesla misled customers about its vehiclesโ self-driving capabilities. The decision warns of potential restrictions in Teslaโs biggest U.S. market if the company doesnโt revise its marketing of ‘Autopilot’ and ‘Full Self-Driving.’ This ruling underscores the growing regulatory scrutiny on how companies communicate advanced driver-assist technologies. #Tesla #Innovation #MarketingEthics #AIRegulation https://lnkd.in/edVVbQkE
To view or add a comment, sign in
3,446 followers
๐ท An administrative law judge in California has found Tesla engaged in deceptive marketing for its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving software. This ruling, stemming from a years-long investigation by the California DMV, asserts that Tesla’s promotional materials created a false impression of these systems’ capabilities, implying a higher level of autonomy than they truly possess. The judge upheld the DMV’s recommendation for 30-day suspensions of Tesla’s sales and manufacturing licenses in California, though these are stayed for 60 days, offering an opportunity for Tesla to modify its marketing. The decision underscores a critical issue in the automotive industry regarding the clear communication of autonomous driving system functionalities. For businesses relying on cutting-edge technology, transparency in marketing is paramount, especially when consumer safety and regulatory compliance are at stake. This case highlights the increasing scrutiny on AI-powered features in consumer products and the potential consequences of perceived overstatements. The outcome of Tesla’s compliance efforts within this 60-day window will be closely watched, potentially setting a precedent for how advanced driver-assistance systems are marketed and regulated moving forward. #Tesla, #Autopilot, #DMV, #MarketingEthics
To view or add a comment, sign in
137 followers
A California judge just ruled Tesla misled customers over Autopilot and Full Self-Driving marketing, ordering a pause on manufacturing/salesโthough DMV granted extra time for compliance. This raises big questions about transparency in EV tech claims. How should automakers communicate advancements without crossing into deception? [via TechCrunch]
To view or add a comment, sign in
114 followers
Autonomy is not just another feature you check off a list. It is the roadmap. When you outsource the brain of the vehicle, you also outsource how fast you can move, how much you can differentiate, and how much long-term value you actually control. By going in-house, Rivian can tightly integrate hardware, software, and sensors, iterate faster on real-world data, and avoid paying a permanent platform tax to a third party. It also sets them up better for what is coming next, including LiDAR, more advanced hands-free capability, and autonomy as a real product, not just marketing. This is the kind of foundational decision that does not get enough attention today but will matter a lot a few years from now. https://lnkd.in/eRev46YD
To view or add a comment, sign in
134 followers
The Tesla ‘Autopilot’ Dilemma: Misleading or Misunderstood? A California judge has made a significant ruling against Tesla, stating that the electric vehicle maker misled consumers about the capabilities of its ‘Autopilot’ and ‘Full Self-Driving’ systems. This decision comes after the California Department of Motor Vehicles accused Tesla of falsely advertising its cars as being capable of complete autonomous driving. The company now faces a 90-day deadline to revise its marketing language or risk a suspension of sales in California. Tesla’s legal team argues that they have always been transparent about the limitations of their driver assistance technologies, insisting that drivers need to remain attentive at all times. However, the debate continues as to whether the branding of these systems creates a perception of full autonomy. As the conversation unfolds, one key question remains: How should companies balance innovation with ethical marketing, particularly in emerging technologies like autonomous vehicles? This is an ongoing dialogue that could have significant implications for the future of automotive advertising. Read more: https://lnkd.in/gyM5_6a5 Photo credit: BusinessInsider
To view or add a comment, sign in
Is autonomous driving actually easier for society to accept when it becomes more โrule-abidingโ? Real-world deployments keep surfacing an uncomfortable pattern: some of the most persistent frictions come from behavior that is perfectly compliant, yet socially unreadableโhesitation at โright-of-wayโ intersections, over-waiting in merges, and procedural pauses when priority is ambiguous. In a human-dominant traffic system, day-to-day safety is sustained less by flawless compliance than by stable expectation alignment. Compliance is the floor; legibility is the order. Traffic is not a collection of rules; it is a mechanism for coordinating expectations. If we evaluate autonomy mainly through violation rates and accident statistics, we may miss the real acceptance bottleneck: social embeddedness. That, in turn, reframes why end-to-end learning can have a structural advantageโnot because it is โbolder,โ but because it can better match the behavioral distributions people already understand. https://lnkd.in/d2sYUxh8
To view or add a comment, sign in
253 followers
California court rules Teslaโs โFull Autopilotโ name is misleading A California court has acknowledged that Teslaโs use of the term โFull Autopilotโ can mislead consumers. The ruling notes that, despite the branding, drivers are still required to maintain full attention and control at all times. Legal and regulatory impact โข Tesla is facing a lawsuit over how it positions and advertises its driver-assistance technology. โข As a potential penalty, the company could lose its license to sell cars in California for up to 30 days. Implications for robotaxis โข The case may also affect Teslaโs robotaxi ambitions. โข Regulators and courts point out that there is still no conclusive evidence Tesla has achieved true autonomous driving. The ruling adds pressure across Silicon Valley, where claims around autonomy are under growing legal and regulatory scrutiny.
To view or add a comment, sign in
California regulators are threatening to suspend Teslaโs sales license for 30 days over deceptive “Full Self-Driving” marketing. Regardless of how advanced Teslaโs tech, history shows us the cost of this gap. Take these two contrasting examples: โขย Volkswagen โDieselgateโ – The clean diesel campaign was a marketing triumph until the engineering reality caught up. That disconnected promise didn’t just cost them $30B+ in fines; it cost them a decade of consumer trust. โขย Mercedes โDrive Pilotโ – On the other hand, when M-B launched Level 3 autonomy with Drive Pilot, they didn’t market it as some โself-driving god modeโ. They marketed it with strict constraints and accepted legal liability when it was active. Trust is a finite resource. As autonomous features become more prevalent, brands must be careful not to get ahead of themselves. Iโd focus on communicating the true benefits of the existing tech to the driver’s, since the majority of shoppers arenโt yet ready to give up control of the wheel.ย https://lnkd.in/grthvB54 #Tesla #Volkswagen #AutomotiveMarketing #BrandTrust #Autonomy
To view or add a comment, sign in
124,126 followers
Create your free account or sign in to continue your search
or
New to LinkedIn? Join now
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedInโs User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
