Experienced scientists produce more persistently disruptive research, finds study – Physics World

Sign into your Physics World account to get access to all available digital issues of the monthly magazine. Your Physics World account is separate to any IOP accounts you may have
Create a Physics World account to get access to all available digital issues of the monthly magazine. Your Physics World account is separate to any IOP accounts you may have.
Note: The verification e-mail to complete your account registration should arrive immediately. However, in some cases it takes longer. Don’t forget to check your spam folder.
If you haven’t received the e-mail in 24 hours, please contact customerservices@ioppublishing.org.
Please enter the e-mail address you used to register to reset your password
Note: The verification e-mail to change your password should arrive immediately. However, in some cases it takes longer. Don’t forget to check your spam folder.
If you haven’t received the e-mail in 24 hours, please contact customerservices@ioppublishing.org
Thank you for registering with Physics World
If you’d like to change your details at any time, please visit My account
Senior scientists produce disruptive research less often than their junior colleagues, but their disruptions are more likely to persist and be consolidated by later research. That is according to an analysis of the publication records of more than 200,000 scientists, which finds that experience helps scientists produce disruptive work that takes longer to be superseded (Proc. Natl. Aca. Sci. 123 e2626763123).
Scientific advances usually build incrementally upon prior research, but progress can often be driven by disruptive research that overturns prior knowledge and leads to new lines of enquiry. One way to decide if a scientific paper is disruptive is if other articles cite it but don’t also reference studies on which the original paper builds, suggesting that it has displaced rather than consolidated earlier work.
Previous research has found that the tendency to produce disruptive work declines over a scientist’s career. But Nan Deng from the National Science Library of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and colleagues now argue that the conventional measure of disruption fails to capture how well disruption endures.
To explore this, they developed a new “persistent disruption index”, which measures whether a disruptive paper is later consolidated or displaced by the work that cites it. The team looked at how much a paper disrupts the work carried out in the references and how much that paper is disrupted by its citing papers.
They define a persistent disruption paper as sitting in the top 5% for reference disruption and the bottom 5% for citation disruption. This, they say, filters out so-called “nonreal disruption” – work that overturns previous research but is then itself quickly overturned.
To explore how the persistence of disruption changes with career stage, Deng and colleagues analysed bibliographic data from SciSciNet on 206,130 scientists whose careers span more than 40 years.
Have you published a disruptive paper? New machine-learning tool helps you check
The analysis showed that as scientific careers progress, the probability of producing a disruptive paper decreases, while the probability of publishing a persistent disruption paper increases. This means that although scientists disrupt less often as they age, their disruptive research is more likely to endure and be built upon.
The team also found the disruptive work of experienced scientists received more attention from both the media and colleagues, which may go some way to increase the likelihood that their disruptive work persists.
The researchers add that evaluation and funding systems focused only on immediately visible disruption may overlook the durability of disruptive ideas, and how experience contributes to such work.
Note: The verification e-mail to complete your account registration should arrive immediately. However, in some cases it takes longer. Don’t forget to check your spam folder.
If you haven’t received the e-mail in 24 hours, please contact customerservices@ioppublishing.org.
Michael Allen is a science writer based in the UK
Explore our two regular podcast series, Physics World Weekly and Physics World Stories
Physics World represents a key part of IOP Publishing’s mission to communicate world-class research and innovation to the widest possible audience. The website forms part of the Physics World portfolio, a collection of online, digital and print information services for the global scientific community.

source