Instagram's erotic content boom brings followers, not brand deals; creators turn to paid Telegram channels – Storyboard18

Provocative content may be helping Indian Instagram creators attract followers, but that visibility is not necessarily translating into higher brand earnings. As advertisers become increasingly cautious about brand safety, some creators are using Instagram primarily to acquire audiences before directing them towards paid Telegram groups, VIP communities and subscription-based platforms.The shift is creating a divide in India's influencer economy, where high engagement no longer guarantees lucrative commercial partnerships and creators are exploring alternative ways to monetise their audiences.Speaking to Storyboard18, Saurabh Sankpal, Co-founder and Chief Creative Officer at Re. Awakening Collective, said suggestive content has become a deliberate growth strategy for some creators, although it is often packaged within mainstream lifestyle formats."Yes, and in India it usually arrives with cultural cover," Sankpal said, pointing to saree try-ons, outfit-check reels, gym transitions and wedding-season dance trends where camera framing and presentation can be used to generate attention."It wins on reach and loses on money," he said.Sankpal argued that creators attracting predominantly young male audiences can generate substantial engagement while offering relatively limited value to brands targeting a different consumer demographic.For instance, a skincare creator whose following consists largely of men aged 18 to 34 may register strong engagement rates without generating corresponding product sales.The disconnect raises questions about whether engagement-led creator growth is sustainable when audience composition and purchasing behaviour do not match advertiser objectives.Instagram becomes an acquisition funnel for paid Telegram communitiesSankpal said some Indian creators are increasingly treating Instagram as the starting point of a broader monetisation funnel rather than their primary source of income."Instagram builds the audience. Then a link-in-bio page or a DM leads to a paid Telegram group, a 'VIP channel' paid for over UPI, or for a smaller group, OnlyFans," he explained.The model allows creators to build visibility through freely accessible Instagram content before directing their most engaged followers towards paid communities offering exclusive access.According to Sankpal, Telegram and UPI-based payments can be more accessible for Indian audiences than international subscription platforms that require cross-border payment methods.The emerging model also represents a departure from the conventional influencer business, where creators primarily generate income through brand endorsements, sponsored content and affiliate commissions.Instead, monetisation becomes more directly dependent on the relationship between creators and their followers.Sankpal described the transition as one in which the public-facing Instagram profile effectively becomes a promotional channel for a separate paid-content business.However, he did not provide estimates for the number of Indian creators following this model or their aggregate subscription earnings.High engagement, limited earnings: The monetisation problemWhile paid communities offer an alternative source of income, Sankpal cautioned that subscription-driven models are not necessarily more lucrative than conventional brand collaborations.He argued that the economics of provocative content can be misleading because rapid follower growth does not always translate into sustainable revenue.A creator attracting high engagement from an audience that is unlikely to purchase the advertised product may struggle to command premium sponsorship fees, regardless of follower count.Sankpal also questioned whether smaller Indian creators could generate sufficient subscription income to replace established brand partnerships.Globally, OnlyFans processed approximately $7.84 billion in fan payments during FY2025, with around $6.29 billion going to creators, according to figures drawn from the platform operator's financial accounts. However, those figures do not indicate how evenly earnings are distributed, particularly among smaller creators.Sankpal argued that abandoning a Rs 50,000 brand collaboration in favour of an uncertain subscription model could be a poor financial trade-off for many Indian influencers.His assessment highlights an emerging tension in the creator economy: audiences willing to consume suggestive content are not necessarily willing to pay for exclusive access or purchase products promoted by the creator.Brand safety concerns are reshaping influencer partnershipsThe rise of provocative content is also complicating influencer selection for advertisers, particularly larger brands that remain sensitive to reputational risks.Sankpal said Indian advertisers are generally more conservative than their global counterparts, with controversies involving creators prompting closer scrutiny of past content and public behaviour.He pointed to the February 2025 controversy surrounding India's Got Latent as an example of how digital content can create reputational concerns for brands and advertising agencies."A brand manager in Mumbai now has to imagine the screenshot, the FIR and the trending hashtag," he said.According to Sankpal, this scrutiny is more pronounced in categories such as FMCG, food and family-oriented consumer products, where advertisers typically prioritise broad audience acceptance.However, performance-oriented advertisers can take a different approach.D2C brands operating in categories such as men's grooming, supplements and fashion may still see commercial value in creators with provocative positioning, particularly when advertising costs are relatively low.Sankpal suggested that such campaigns can remain attractive when brands prioritise reach, cost efficiency and immediate conversions over broader reputational considerations.Brand caution is not uniform: The India's Got Latent exampleWhile creator controversies can temporarily affect commercial partnerships, advertisers do not necessarily avoid controversial entertainment properties permanently.The second season of India's Got Latent, which premiered in June 2026, featured brand integrations involving Flipkart Minutes, Avvatar and AI+ Nova. The sponsorships demonstrated that brands could return to an entertainment property following a major controversy, particularly when its audience remained commercially attractive. Sankpal cited these associations to illustrate the difference between advertisers seeking broad brand safety and those willing to participate in unconventional, youth-oriented content.The distinction, he suggested, is becoming increasingly important as creators seek to monetise audiences that may be commercially valuable to certain categories but unsuitable for others.For agencies, evaluating influencer partnerships could therefore require more than analysing reach, follower count and engagement rates. Audience composition, historical content and the potential for reputational backlash are becoming important considerations.Instagram subscriptions offer an alternative, but paid access remains a challengeInstagram itself offers subscriptions through which eligible creators can provide exclusive posts, Reels, Stories, live sessions and subscriber interactions.Meta introduced these tools to help creators develop recurring income and establish closer relationships with their audiences.However, Sankpal believes Indian consumers are more willing to pay for tangible products or specialised knowledge than for access to an individual's personal content.He identified educators, astrologers, finance creators and fitness coaches as categories comparatively better positioned to monetise through subscriptions.For creators whose audiences are primarily attracted by their appearance or provocative presentation, converting free followers into paying subscribers may prove more difficult.Sankpal also highlighted the risk of paid content being copied, leaked and redistributed without permission, undermining the exclusivity on which subscription businesses depend.Regulatory scrutiny adds another risk for paid-content creatorsBeyond monetisation and brand safety, creators operating paid-content businesses face potential legal and platform-related risks.In July 2025, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting directed the blocking of 25 OTT platforms, including Ullu and ALTT, over content deemed obscene or otherwise unlawful. The action involved provisions of the Information Technology Act and other applicable legislation. India News – The Indian Express+1In July 2026, the government informed Parliament that 50 OTT platforms had been disabled over the preceding two years for violations involving obscene content and applicable laws. Press Information BureauSankpal cautioned that individual creators selling unlawful sexually explicit material could face legal exposure under relevant provisions. However, suggestive content and lawful adult subscription content should not automatically be equated with illegal obscenity.For creators using Instagram to promote external paid communities, the risks also extend to violations of platform policies, account restrictions and unauthorised redistribution of content.Instagram's subscription monetisation framework requires creators to comply with its community and monetisation policies, including restrictions relating to sexualised content. CFDAIs Instagram becoming an OnlyFans-lite platform?Despite the growing use of Instagram as a promotional funnel for paid communities, Sankpal does not expect the platform as a whole to evolve into an adult subscription service.Instead, he believes the transition is happening at the level of individual creators.He suggested that an account effectively becomes a paid-content business when most of its income comes directly from subscribers, its public Instagram feed primarily directs users elsewhere, and followers show greater interest in the creator personally than in products being recommended."At that point it's a paid-content business using Instagram as free advertising," Sankpal said.He expects Meta to continue policing content and accounts that violate its rules while creators experiment with suggestive formats that remain within platform boundaries.For advertisers, the resulting challenge is distinguishing between content that generates attention and creators who can build genuine commercial influence.The implications extend across an Indian influencer marketing industry that EY previously projected would reach Rs 3,375 crore by 2026. As creator monetisation becomes increasingly fragmented across brand deals, platform subscriptions and private paid communities, engagement metrics alone may become a less reliable indicator of commercial value.For India's creator economy, the central question is no longer simply how quickly an influencer can build an audience, but whether that audience can generate predictable income without restricting future brand opportunities.The conversation highlighted a fundamental shift underway in the relationship between audiences, platforms and brands. Rather than treating Gen Z as a uniform consumer segment, marketers are increasingly having to account for individual behaviours, fragmented content consumption and a stronger expectationStoryboard18 brings you top five news updates from the world of advertising, marketing, and business of brands. Special Coverage“Range matters now”: Microsoft’s Puneet Chandok, GrowthSchool’s Vaibhav Sisinty on the skills that will define Gen Z careersSpecial Coverage“Range matters now”: Microsoft’s Puneet Chandok, GrowthSchool’s Vaibhav Sisinty on the skills that will define Gen Z careersSpecial Coverage‘Somebody else will do it’ mindset must change: Tukaram Mundhe on his vision for India at Storyboard18 Global GenZ SummitSpecial Coverage‘The real pink slip in the AI era is your refusal to learn’: Microsoft's Puneet Chandoksource